Even though the SF Giants had a very bad 2026 season under rookie manager Tony Vitello, the public sentiment on Vitello seems more split than one would have expected. Some certainly wish that he was axed after his first season but others feel that he was given a flawed roster and was set up to fail in many ways.
One thought I had early in the season was that the Vitello hire could end up looking like the blunder the San Francisco 49ers made when they hired Jim Tomsula to be head coach after moving on from Jim Harbaugh. I am not the only one who has made this comparison as Chris Thompson of Defector made the connection all the way back in April and Sean Keane of McCovey Chronicles recently likened the two.
For those who have forgotten that brutal season for the 2015 49ers with Tomsula at the helm, the team went 5-11 and while Tomsula seemed like a decent guy whose heart was in the right place he was pretty clearly out of his depth as an NFL head coach when he had only been a defensive line coach before his promotion. It also seemed like he didn’t have a ton of control over the team, something that certainly seemed to be the case with Vitello at times as well.
Also like Vitello, Tomsula had the misfortune of a lackluster roster after a number of star 49ers either retired or departed in free agency. At the time I sort of thought they’d give him another chance but Jed York decided to pull the plug after that first season.
Vitello certainly seemed to be a fish out of water at times in 2026. That’s to be expected given he had no professional baseball coaching experience and it begs the question why president of baseball operations Buster Posey felt he’d be ready to assume that role given his background.
Vitello has a chance to prove the Tomsula comparisons wrong
The key difference is that Posey is willing to roll the dice on him again whereas York and the 49ers chose to move on from Tomsula in favor of Chip Kelly, a decision that was somehow even worse than the Tomsula hire. Perhaps Posey feels he’s staked his reputation on Vitello in many ways and the optics of firing him after just one season would have just been too much to stomach.
Or maybe he sincerely believes that Vitello is the right man for the job and he will grow into the role in year two. It’s a heck of a bet to make and if 2027 ends up being like 2026 it seems somewhat unlikely that either of them will make it to 2028 still with the team.
So we cannot definitively say the Vitello hire is akin to the Tomsula one just yet. If Vitello is at the helm for a Giants playoff run or even a winning season then he’ll have been a much better hire but as of right now the parallels are a little too close for comfort.
