The SF Giants should have a good bit of financial flexibility this offseason. How much is up in the air, but according to Cot's, they have committed $183 million against the luxury tax in 2027.
The unknown is how baseball will treat the luxury tax going forward. For years, teams have operated under a soft salary cap. They could exceed that amount, but the penalties are often a tax on the overage and a loss of prospect capital if they sign a player who rejects a qualifying offer. Oftentimes, that penalty has been a slap on the wrist.
In this Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) cycle, the owners are pushing for a hard salary cap. The players' union has typically been against this, as they believe that it will limit what they can earn in free agency.
The likely outcome is somehwere in the middle. The league minimum salary increases, along with a higher luxury tax threshold and more stringent penalties to those teams who exceed the luxury tax.
During the last CBA cycle, the luxury tax threshold increased by about $30 in the first year, and then saw marginal increases in the ensuing four years. If baseball sees a similar increase, which is a bold and flawed assumption, that would push the luxury tax to about $280 million.
SF Giants will have the flexibility to cover multiple needs this offseason
That figure would put the Giants nearly $100 million under the luxury tax threshold, but again, this is just a thought experiment.
The Giants have several priorities to address this offseason, including bolstering the rotation, bullpen, and lineup against left-handed pitching. They likely need more than one rotation arm, which can eat up any flexibility quickly. The average rate for even a back-end starter is often around $10 million.
Oddly enough, while this year's free agency class for starting pitchers is light on frontline starters outside of Tarik Skubal, it may also be a class that fits within the Giants' risk tolerance. There are plenty of veteran starters who could be added on shorter-term deals. Kevin Gausman, Sony Gray, Clay Holmes, and even David Peterson.
The front office has vowed to upgrade the bullpen as well. They need another southpaw reliever, along with a high-leverage arm. Given the bullpen struggles the Giants had in 2026, these should be separate relievers, and ones who can push the current group one peg down in the bullpen hierarchy.
The Giants do not need to upgrade the lineup, but it would behoove them to add some insurance in macthups. They have been among the worst against left-handed pitching over the past two seasons.
No one knows what the next CBA will look like. However, if recent history is any indication, it should give the Giants a little more flexibility to fill quite a few holes on a roster that only won 65 games in 2026.
