SF Giants pursue insanity, get burned again in 2-1 loss to the Tampa Bay Rays

The SF Giants leaned on Ryan Walker again to get through a high-leverage situation. For the second time in as many appearances, the Giants got burned again, as the Rays tied the game and eventually won it in extra innings.

SF Giants pursue insanity, get burned again in 2-1 loss to the Tampa Bay Rays

The real story is the offense. The Giants scored just two runs in 28 innings against the Rays over the weekend. They also did not hit a home run on the six-game road trip.

That is an important detail because they are losing the home run battle. They have only hit 19 home runs, while they have allowed 32 home runs. That is not an unusually high number of home runs allowed. In fact, they are tied with the Los Angeles Angels and Seattle Mariners for ninth place in that category.

That said, home run differential is usually a good indicator for a team. Teams that hit more home runs than they allow typically put up better records. For the Giants, they gave up five home runs while hitting none across six games.

On Sunday, the offense was the story. However, it was a decision by Tony Vitello that opened the door for the Rays to get back into the game. He went with Ryan Walker in the eighth inning of a 1-0 game. Walker has struggled to a 4.26 ERA in 12.2 innings this year.

The right-handed reliever has been even worse than that in high-leverage spots. Since the start of 2025, he has put up an 8.87 ERA in those spots, which is the 2nd-highest mark of any reliever with at least 20 innings pitched.

When Walker entered the game, it felt like the outcome was predetermined. He allowed a run to score to tie the game. The game went into extra innings, and the Giants were walked off to finish a miserable road trip.

The Giants are forcing Walker into a role that is just not working. There is plenty of data to support this. This is not a knock on Walker. It is a mistake to use him in high-leverage situations, even if he gets out of it.

This is why bullpen decisions should be looked at through the lens of process decisions, rather than the results. A good process can still lead to bad results, but that does not mean it was a bad decision. With Walker in close games, it is a bad process that often leads to bad results.

Vitello cannot control the offensive skid. There is very little margin for error with his decisions, but those decisions also get put under a microscope. Bullpen decisions are one of the few in-game levers he can pull. With Walker, it was clearly a bad process again, and the Giants paid for it.

There is a way to use Walker effectively in the bullpen, but that is in sharp contrast to how he has been deployed. For the past year, the Giants have continued to put him in suboptimal spots, hoping for different results.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Follow