Schulman: “It would be wrong to rule out a Carlos Beltran return”

The Giants have a lot of decisions to make in the offseason. Whether to resign Hunter Pence (or, in reality, how big of check they will offer him), Tim Lincecum, and Javier Lopez will probably be on their priority list. However, getting some power in the lineup and shoring up left field will definitely be near the top of that list.

Carlos Beltran Giants

Credit: Chris Humphreys-USA TODAY Sports

While there has been a lot of talk about the possibility of playing Brandon Belt in left field and searching for a first baseman, one very interesting tidbit was dropped tonight by the SF Chronicle’s Henry Schulman. He said, that a Carlos Beltran signing by the Giants in the offseason could be an option.

Interestingly, a Giants source suggested it would be wrong to rule out a Beltran return, even after he and the front office engaged in a war of words about the team’s interest in re-signing him (or lack thereof) after his brief stay in 2011.

I really don’t want to make a mountain out of a molehill, and I fully expect that scenario not to happen, but I admit, my mouth dropped a bit when I read that. Just that it would be on the table surprised me. I think Beltran is a professional, and I think the Giants are a class organization, so I wouldn’t expect a pissing match over whatever went down after the 2011 season. I just didn’t expect it to really be an option.  Perhaps it’s not for Beltran. Maybe it’s just wishful thinking on the Giants’ part, or vice versa. Who knows?

I actually wouldn’t be opposed to it. Of course, Beltran did not have great numbers in San Francisco, but he wasn’t bad. He did hit .323 in 44 games and 179 plate appearances. It’s better than anyone has hit this season. He had better batting numbers that partial season than he did the past two season in St. Louis. But he didn’t hit home runs and spent some time on the disabled list, so many fans saw it as a failed trade. It would be interesting to see what a healthy Beltran could do in San Francisco. Beltran isn’t getting any younger though, so a long-term contract is probably not in his stars, at least not in San Francisco.

What do you think? Would you support a return of Beltran to the Giants or prefer the Giants look elsewhere to solve their scoring problems?

Topics: Carlos Beltran, San Francisco Giants

Want more from Around the Foghorn?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • Brett Buck

    The most glaring issue is a third outfielder, so, worth a look. I thought it was a big mistake to let him go in the first place. What they have to give him is the real issue. It’s hard to criticize an organization that has won 2 WS in 3 years, but there is an unfortunate tendency towards cheaping out and hoping for the best.

    • Melissa Felkins

      It probably will depend on how much we pay Pence, and if Lincecum gets resigned, or who we pick up for the rotation. I do think money would be the biggest issue there, but it would HAVE to be short-term either way. I wouldn’t be opposed to it.

      • Brett Buck

        Don’t forget that Zito goes off the books this year, that should free up some cash. Timmy will not get a deal like Cain or Bumgarner, particularly not with Petit and Gaudin playing the way they have. He’ll get a respectable offer but not crazy, he’s headed towards being a long reliever.

        • Melissa Felkins

          True, but they have to make at least a qualifying offer to Timmy, and plan to do so. And his QO is probably more than the Giants probably truthfully want to pay him.